Publication summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 792 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Inside Climate News results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 781 hits . Analysis detected 4,489 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,168 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 93% (32 of 399 publications). This Inside Climate News is worse (more manipulative) than 92.20% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 3,168
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 92.2% percentile 5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 11.8% 11.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 24.6% 24.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Publication 7.9% 7.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 5.9% 5.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Publication 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 18.3% 18.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 11.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 24.6%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Publication 18.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 18.3%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Publication 5.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Publication 7.9%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Publication 6.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Publication 6.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 2.0% Indoctrination: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst