Keyword summary
⁠7%3 analyzed articles/videos2,104 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Green Living & Environmental Issues results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 2.2% saturation with 204 hits. Analysis detected 2,229 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,220 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (53,881 of 54,554 keywords). This Green Living & Environmental Issues is better (less manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group.
Green Living & Environmental Issues
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 9,220
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

1% percentile
02550751001.2% percentile
0.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos