Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 914 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Great Recession results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 939 hits . Analysis detected 5,530 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,711 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (32,009 of 37,536 keywords). This Great Recession is better (less manipulative) than 85.30% of the peer group. Great Recession
Keyword details
Total words: 8,711
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst