Keyword summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos1,195 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grace Periods results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 928 hits. Analysis detected 7,675 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,308 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (24,513 of 35,675 keywords). This Grace Periods is better (less manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group.
Grace Periods
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
32%Grace Periods (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,308
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

31% percentile
025507510031.3% percentile
2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.2%11.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate