Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,140 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicole Weatherholtz results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 1,279 hits . Analysis detected 11,977 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,720 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,226 of 6,628 authors). This Nicole Weatherholtz is worse (more manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group. Nicole Weatherholtz
Author details
Total words: 7,720
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.4% percentile 3.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.3% 13.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 10.6% 10.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.1% 12.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 8.9% 8.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 6.9% False Dilemma: Author 7.3%, sitewide 1.5% Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Straw Man: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst