Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,280 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gigi Hadid results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Anchoring Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 1,349 hits. Analysis detected 8,209 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,120 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (18,478 of 37,536 keywords). This Gigi Hadid is worse (more manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group.
Gigi Hadid
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
51%Gigi Hadid (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,120
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

51% percentile
025507510050.8% percentile
2.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 14.8%14.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 13.3%13.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 13.6%13.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate