Keyword summary
83% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,742 analyzed words
BS Summary: These George Cottrell results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.6% saturation with 2,395 hits . Analysis detected 15,380 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,338 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 65% (13,288 of 37,536 keywords). This George Cottrell is worse (more manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group. George Cottrell
Keyword details
Total words: 9,338
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.6% percentile 3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 22.7% 22.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 17.8% 17.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 25.6% 25.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 25.6%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 22.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 17.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst