Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video344 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gargash results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Slippery Slope, with Status Quo Bias as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 184 hits. Analysis detected 1,900 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,032 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of 89% (4,322 of 37,536 keywords). This Gargash is worse (more manipulative) than 88.50% of the peer group.
Gargash
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
89%Gargash (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,032
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

89% percentile
025507510088.5% percentile
6.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Keyword 17.8%17.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.4%12.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 14.4%14.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 10.4%10.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 19.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 17.8%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 15.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 4.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Middle Ground: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos