Keyword summary
65%3 analyzed articles/videos611 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Frisco results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 860 hits. Analysis detected 5,749 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,469 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 58% (16,019 of 37,536 keywords). This Frisco is worse (more manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group.
Frisco
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
58%Frisco (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,469
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

57% percentile
025507510057.3% percentile
3.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 15.7%15.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 11.5%11.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 11.8%11.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 5.7%5.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate