Keyword summary
27%2 analyzed articles/videos200 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fries results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, False Dilemma, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 957 hits. Analysis detected 2,273 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,857 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 1% (35,480 of 35,840 keywords). This Fries is better (less manipulative) than 99.00% of the peer group.
Fries
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
1%Fries (selected)1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,857
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

1% percentile
02550751001.0% percentile
1.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.5%Straw Man: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Special Pleading: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos