Keyword summary
⁠80%6 analyzed articles/videos535 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Freddie Mac results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 1,300 hits. Analysis detected 10,802 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,375 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (22,289 of 35,199 keywords). This Freddie Mac is better (less manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group.
Freddie Mac
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠37%Freddie Mac (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 10,375
Article count: 6
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

37% percentile
025507510036.7% percentile
2.4% BS Score6 analyzed articles10.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.5%12.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos