Keyword summary
82% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,207 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Francisco Lindor results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 535 hits . Analysis detected 4,416 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,621 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 55% (17,225 of 37,536 keywords). This Francisco Lindor is worse (more manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group. Francisco Lindor
Keyword details
Total words: 3,621
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.1% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.8% 14.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst