Keyword summary
24%4 analyzed articles/videos310 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fort Lauderdale results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 508 hits. Analysis detected 3,790 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,480 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (18,379 of 37,536 keywords). This Fort Lauderdale is worse (more manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group.
Fort Lauderdale
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
51%Fort Lauderdale (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,480
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

51% percentile
025507510051.0% percentile
2.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.3%11.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate