Keyword summary
24% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,423 analyzed words
BS Summary: These For Profit Colleges results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,222 hits . Analysis detected 7,770 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,893 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (31,199 of 37,536 keywords). This For Profit Colleges is better (less manipulative) than 83.10% of the peer group. For Profit Colleges
Keyword details
Total words: 9,893
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.9% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst