Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Adam Echelman results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 651 hits . Analysis detected 3,901 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,624 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,316 authors). This Adam Echelman is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Adam Echelman
Author details
Total words: 5,624
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Special Pleading: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst