Keyword summary
34% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,414 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Assistance results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 1,756 hits . Analysis detected 20,953 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,408 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (29,669 of 37,536 keywords). This Food Assistance is better (less manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group. Food Assistance
Keyword details
Total words: 24,408
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.0% percentile 1.9% BS Score7 analyzed articles24.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst