Keyword summary
34%7 analyzed articles/videos4,414 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Assistance results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 1,756 hits. Analysis detected 20,953 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,408 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (29,669 of 37,536 keywords). This Food Assistance is better (less manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group.
Food Assistance
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
21%Food Assistance (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

21% percentile
025507510021.0% percentile
1.9% BS Score7 analyzed articles24.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate