Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,140 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Flu Shot results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 1,077 hits. Analysis detected 6,127 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,215 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 73% (9,708 of 34,832 keywords). This Flu Shot is worse (more manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group.
Flu Shot
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
73%Flu Shot (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,215
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

72% percentile
025507510072.1% percentile
4.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.4%12.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 20.6%20.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 20.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 4.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos