Keyword summary
90% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,492 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Judges results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 3,845 hits . Analysis detected 37,094 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,733 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 60% (14,639 of 35,865 keywords). This Federal Judges is worse (more manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group. Federal Judges
Keyword details
Total words: 21,733
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.2% percentile 3.3% BS Score7 analyzed articles21.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.5% 14.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 17.7% 17.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.7% Straw Man: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst