Keyword summary
21% 4 analyzed articles/videos 461 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Grants results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 1,040 hits . Analysis detected 6,976 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,554 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (29,844 of 35,096 keywords). This Federal Grants is better (less manipulative) than 85.00% of the peer group. Federal Grants
Keyword details
Total words: 11,554
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.0% percentile 1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst