Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,630 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Farmers Market results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 640 hits. Analysis detected 5,537 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,520 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (24,048 of 34,543 keywords). This Farmers Market is better (less manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group.
Farmers Market
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
31%Farmers Market (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,520
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

30% percentile
025507510030.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos