Keyword summary
83% 2 analyzed articles/videos 427 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Exchange Traded Funds results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 759 hits . Analysis detected 3,995 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,552 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 54% (17,380 of 37,536 keywords). This Exchange Traded Funds is worse (more manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group. Exchange Traded Funds
Keyword details
Total words: 4,552
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.7% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 16.7% 16.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst