Keyword summary
58%2 analyzed articles/videos161 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Epic Poem results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 1,249 hits. Analysis detected 6,003 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,355 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 50% (18,873 of 37,536 keywords). This Epic Poem is better (less manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Epic Poem
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
50%Epic Poem (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,355
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

50% percentile
025507510049.7% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 19.6%19.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.9%4.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 11.2%11.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 8.6%8.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate