Keyword summary
27% 5 analyzed articles/videos 5,812 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmentalism results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 2,278 hits . Analysis detected 18,868 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,788 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (32,754 of 36,715 keywords). This Environmentalism is better (less manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group. Environmentalism
Keyword details
Total words: 25,788
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.8% percentile 1.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles25.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst