Keyword summary
74% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,496 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Regulation results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 838 hits . Analysis detected 6,301 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,819 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 59% (15,098 of 36,607 keywords). This Environmental Regulation is worse (more manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group. Environmental Regulation
Keyword details
Total words: 4,819
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.8% percentile 3.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 17.4% 17.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 16.9% 16.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst