Keyword summary
79% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,748 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Consumption results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 1,824 hits . Analysis detected 13,230 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,029 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (25,058 of 37,536 keywords). This Energy Consumption is better (less manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group. Energy Consumption
Keyword details
Total words: 13,029
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.2% percentile 2.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles13K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.0% 14.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst