Keyword summary
62% 19 analyzed articles/videos 12,427 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Policy results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 6,786 hits . Analysis detected 62,630 faulty-reasoning hits from 59,831 analyzed words across 19 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 23% (27,395 of 35,211 keywords). This Economic Policy is better (less manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group. Economic Policy
Keyword details
Total words: 59,831
Article count: 19
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score19 analyzed articles59.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst