Keyword summary
56% 28 analyzed articles/videos 37,171 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Development results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 9,938 hits . Analysis detected 114,955 faulty-reasoning hits from 144,875 analyzed words across 28 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (33,045 of 35,686 keywords). This Economic Development is better (less manipulative) than 92.60% of the peer group. Economic Development
Keyword details
Total words: 144,875
Article count: 28
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.4% percentile 1.5% BS Score28 analyzed articles144.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst