Author summary
10%1 analyzed article/video2,588 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eric Olander results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 935 hits. Analysis detected 5,161 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,352 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 12% (5,547 of 6,244 authors). This Eric Olander is better (less manipulative) than 88.80% of the peer group.
Eric Olander
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
12%Eric Olander (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 10,352
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

11% percentile
025507510011.2% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles10.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 9.0%9.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.0%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos