Keyword summary
⁠0%5 analyzed articles/videos6,455 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eating Disorders results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 3,216 hits. Analysis detected 28,089 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,156 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (24,998 of 36,358 keywords). This Eating Disorders is better (less manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group.
Eating Disorders
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠32%Eating Disorders (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

31% percentile
025507510031.2% percentile
2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles27.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.8%11.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos