Keyword summary
51%3 analyzed articles/videos1,685 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Drone Strike results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 801 hits. Analysis detected 5,738 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,740 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (23,314 of 36,715 keywords). This Drone Strike is better (less manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group.
Drone Strike
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
37%Drone Strike (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,740
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

37% percentile
025507510036.5% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.9%11.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.2%5.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate