BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Unattributed Quote, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 42.5% saturation with 201 hits. Analysis detected 907 faulty-reasoning hits from 473 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

(Background) A statue of Qassem Soleimani, the commander of the Revolutionary Guards, assassinated in Iraq by the U.S. in 2020, decorates a street in Tehran on February 22, 2026. 
(Photo by ATTA KENARE / AFP via Getty Images) / (L) U.S. 
Secretary of State Marco Rubio attends the “Shield of the Americas” Summit at Trump National Doral in Miami, Florida, on March 7, 2026. 
(Photo by Rebecca Blackwell / POOL / AFP via Getty Images) 
United States Secretary of State Marco Rubio revoked the green cards of two of deceased Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Major General Qasem Soleimani’s relatives living in the U.S., allowing them to be arrested by federal immigration enforcement officers. 
“Until recently, Hamideh Soleimani Afshar and her daughter were green card holders living lavishly in the United States,” Rubio stated on X Saturday, identifying Soleimani’s niece and grandniece. 
According to Rubio, Soleimani Afshar is “an outspoken supporter of the Iranian regime who celebrated attacks on Americans and referred to our country as the ‘Great Satan.’” 
The two relatives were taken into Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) custody on Friday in Los Angeles, where they had been living. 
“This week, I terminated both Afshar and her daughter’s legal status and they are now in ICE custody, pending removal from the United States,” Rubio announced. 
“The Trump Administration will not allow our country to become a home for foreign nationals who support anti-American terrorist regimes.” 
Officials claim that Soleimani Afshar had celebrated military strikes against the U.S. during the ongoing conflict in the Middle East. 
She also allegedly praised Iran’s new supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, after his father and predecessor, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was killed in an Israeli strike on February 28th. 
According to the State Department’s news release on Saturday, while living in the U.S., she voiced “unflinching support” for the IRGC, a designated terrorist organization, and pushed its propaganda. 
The department added that Soleimani Afshar’s husband “has also been barred from entering the United States.” 
The secretary also recently terminated the legal status of Fatemeh Ardeshir-Larijani, daughter of former Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council of Iran Ali Larijani, and her husband, Seyed Kalantar Motamedi. 
Both individuals have since exited the country and are not permitted reentry. 
Soleimani was responsible for Iran’s overseas military and intelligence operations until he was killed in a U.S. drone strike near Baghdad International Airport in January 2020, when he was 62 years old. 
Trump administration officials at the time said that he was actively plotting attacks against U.S. personnel and interests in the Middle East and the strike was intended to quash those plans. 
Soleimani supported armed groups across Iraq, Syria and Lebanon, and the U.S. considered him responsible for attacks that killed American troops in the Iraq War. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 5.9%One America News Network: 4.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.9%One America News Network: 2.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 13.5%Katherine Mosack: 3.5%One America News Network: 3.9%Availability Heuristic13.5%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.7%One America News Network: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 3.7%One America News Network: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 11.0%Katherine Mosack: 16.3%One America News Network: 15.3%Framing Effect11.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.8%One America News Network: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.7%One America News Network: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 4.0%One America News Network: 4.3%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 42.5%Katherine Mosack: 15.0%One America News Network: 11.8%Negativity Bias42.5%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 3.6%One America News Network: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 3.4%One America News Network: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%Katherine Mosack: 4.9%One America News Network: 3.9%In-Group Bias4.2%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 5.1%One America News Network: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 4.6%One America News Network: 5.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.8%One America News Network: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.7%Katherine Mosack: 1.3%One America News Network: 2.0%Recency Bias5.7%This article: 6.8%Katherine Mosack: 0.7%One America News Network: 0.7%Primacy Effect6.8%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 9.9%Katherine Mosack: 4.6%One America News Network: 2.5%Ad Hominem9.9%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.5%One America News Network: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 12.7%Katherine Mosack: 5.9%One America News Network: 6.3%Appeal to Authority12.7%This article: 4.2%Katherine Mosack: 2.5%One America News Network: 1.8%False Dilemma4.2%This article: 5.5%Katherine Mosack: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.1%Slippery Slope5.5%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.1%Katherine Mosack: 5.8%One America News Network: 5.4%Hasty Generalization6.1%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 21.1%Katherine Mosack: 11.3%One America News Network: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion21.1%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 3.2%One America News Network: 1.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 11.0%Katherine Mosack: 3.3%One America News Network: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)11.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.2%Katherine Mosack: 0.6%One America News Network: 0.6%Burden of Proof4.2%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.5%One America News Network: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.0%One America News Network: 1.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.6%One America News Network: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.6%One America News Network: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 16.7%Katherine Mosack: 2.0%One America News Network: 1.7%Unattributed Quote16.7%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 12.3%Katherine Mosack: 6.3%One America News Network: 5.2%Biased Writer Voice12.3%This article: 4.2%Katherine Mosack: 1.7%One America News Network: 1.1%Indoctrination4.2%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.2%One America News Network: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 3.3%One America News Network: 3.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.0%One America News Network: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

473 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers31%attributed speech327writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 28 words • 100.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 26 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageState Department • 29 words • 100.0% coverageState Department • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Marco Rubio

100%flagged-word coverage
101 attributed words69% of attributed speech70% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Unattributed Quote+12.1 ptsWriter: 15.6%Marco Rubio: 27.7%27.7%Indoctrination+19.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Marco Rubio: 19.8%19.8%Biased Writer Voice-8.9 ptsWriter: 8.9%Marco Rubio: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.