Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,237 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Downtown St Louis results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 322 hits . Analysis detected 2,139 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,983 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (31,185 of 34,916 keywords). This Downtown St Louis is better (less manipulative) than 89.30% of the peer group. Downtown St Louis
Keyword details
Total words: 4,983
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.7% percentile 1.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst