Author summary
23% 2 analyzed articles/videos 831 analyzed words
BS Summary: These St. Louis Public Radio results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 372 hits . Analysis detected 2,302 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,844 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (2,819 of 6,628 authors). This St. Louis Public Radio is worse (more manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group. St. Louis Public Radio
Author details
Total words: 2,844
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.5% percentile 2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.3% 6.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.1% 13.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.3% 6.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.9% 4.9% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Special Pleading: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.3% False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst