Missouri cyclospora cases go up as outbreak linked to alleged supplier from St. Louis E. coli scare 45%

By St. Louis Public Radio23%

7/18/2026, 6:53:36 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.7% saturation with 138 hits. Analysis detected 1,170 faulty-reasoning hits from 480 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 47.4% and a BS Rank of 45% (12,212 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 55.80% of the article peer group.

The Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services has now identified more than 80 people who have tested positive for a diarrhea-causing parasite that has sickened thousands, and a supplier linked to the nationwide outbreak is the same producer that has been linked to a rash of E. coli cases in St. 
Louis in 2024. 
Missouri health officials have seen a significant increase in cyclospora cases in the past two weeks, but numbers are still below those of other states, Nathan Koffarnus, assistant bureau chief for the agency's communicable disease bureau, said during a press call Thursday. 
Federal officials have linked cyclospora to lettuce served at Taco Bell locations in Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and West Virginia. 
The Associated Press cited a federal official who claims the produce company Taylor Farms supplied the lettuce. 
St. 
Louis Public Radio has not confirmed that report. 
Taylor Farms on Friday afternoon announced it was pulling all lettuce from Central Mexico from the U.S. market. 
"While the FDA traceback is indicating a specific independent farm that represents less than 1% of the U.S.'s iceberg lettuce supply as the potential source of the outbreak, we have removed all iceberg lettuce from the region indefinitely," a statement from the company read. 
Lawsuits filed in federal and St. 
Louis County courts claim that Taylor Farms supplied the produce that caused a St. 
Louis E. coli outbreak that sickened 115 people who attended a catered school event in 2024. 
The producer has denied that allegation. 
Bill Marler, a lawyer who represents St. 
Louis-area plaintiffs who sued Taylor Farms after that outbreak, said it's rare for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the Food and Drug Administration not to name the source of the outbreak. 
"[Health officials] say it's one processor who processed iceberg lettuce from Mexico, but they don't name the processor, and that's pretty unusual," Marler said. 
"I don't really have a good explanation of why they didn't name it." 
Cases like this shouldn't happen, Marler said, but Taylor Farms is a large supplier and has been tied to other national food poisoning outbreaks. 
"They're just a big player, and so they supply a lot of people, and these outbreaks happen," he said. 
Cyclospora infections can cause watery diarrhea, nausea and dehydration. 
The parasite rarely causes fever or vomiting, and most people infected can recover without antibiotics. 
Koffarnus said he doesn't know if the cases in Missouri are connected to the outbreaks in other states. 
"Do we have cases that haven't left the state of Missouri? 
Do they have anything in common with the cases in Michigan? 
At this point in time, we just don't know," Koffarnus said. 
Taylor Farms representatives did not respond to St. 
Louis Public Radio's request for comment. 
Copyright 2026 St. 
Louis Public Radio 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 18.3%St. Louis Public Radio: 4.9%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Confirmation Bias18.3%This article: 0.0%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 14.2%St. Louis Public Radio: 3.1%Columbia Missourian: 2.7%Availability Heuristic14.2%This article: 18.1%St. Louis Public Radio: 4.4%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic18.1%This article: 0.0%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 7.7%St. Louis Public Radio: 5.1%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias7.7%This article: 12.7%St. Louis Public Radio: 5.3%Columbia Missourian: 5.5%Framing Effect12.7%This article: 0.0%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.9%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.7%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Status Quo Bias1.7%This article: 0.0%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.2%St. Louis Public Radio: 3.5%Columbia Missourian: 4.5%Optimism Bias9.2%This article: 0.0%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 28.7%St. Louis Public Radio: 6.3%Columbia Missourian: 5.4%Negativity Bias28.7%This article: 7.1%St. Louis Public Radio: 2.7%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias7.1%This article: 1.3%St. Louis Public Radio: 1.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error1.3%This article: 0.0%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%St. Louis Public Radio: 1.3%Columbia Missourian: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.8%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.8%St. Louis Public Radio: 2.6%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Recency Bias8.8%This article: 0.0%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.7%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 22.5%St. Louis Public Radio: 6.3%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Appeal to Authority22.5%This article: 2.3%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.4%Columbia Missourian: 1.1%False Dilemma2.3%This article: 0.0%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 17.7%St. Louis Public Radio: 13.1%Columbia Missourian: 3.6%Hasty Generalization17.7%This article: 0.0%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.9%St. Louis Public Radio: 2.7%Columbia Missourian: 5.2%Appeal to Emotion7.9%This article: 2.7%St. Louis Public Radio: 1.4%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Begging the Question2.7%This article: 10.8%St. Louis Public Radio: 2.5%Columbia Missourian: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.8%This article: 0.0%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.7%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.9%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.5%Columbia Missourian: 2.6%Anecdotal2.9%This article: 0.0%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.8%St. Louis Public Radio: 1.8%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.8%This article: 0.0%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 9.2%St. Louis Public Radio: 1.5%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Special Pleading9.2%This article: 0.0%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 10.6%St. Louis Public Radio: 3.6%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Unattributed Quote10.6%This article: 0.0%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 18.5%St. Louis Public Radio: 3.1%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Biased Writer Voice18.5%This article: 0.0%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%St. Louis Public Radio: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

480 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers70%attributed speech144writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageMissouri Department of Health and Senior Services • 52 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageNathan Koffarnus • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageSt. Louis Public Radio • 8 words • 0.0% coverageTaylor Farms • 18 words • 0.0% coverageTaylor Farms • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageBill Marler • 7 words • 0.0% coverageBill Marler • 34 words • 0.0% coverageBill Marler • 24 words • 100.0% coverageBill Marler • 13 words • 0.0% coverageBill Marler • 24 words • 0.0% coverageBill Marler • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageNathan Koffarnus • 18 words • 0.0% coverageNathan Koffarnus • 11 words • 0.0% coverageNathan Koffarnus • 11 words • 0.0% coverageNathan Koffarnus • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
52 attributed words15% of attributed speech63% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+91.0 ptsWriter: 9.0%Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote-35.4 ptsWriter: 35.4%Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.