Keyword summary
27% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,494 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Downtown Berkeley results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Anchoring Bias , and Framing Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 977 hits . Analysis detected 5,730 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,171 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (29,655 of 34,985 keywords). This Downtown Berkeley is better (less manipulative) than 84.80% of the peer group. Downtown Berkeley
Keyword details
Total words: 9,171
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.2% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst