Keyword summary
60% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,420 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Doug Ford results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 1,203 hits . Analysis detected 9,945 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,977 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (26,681 of 34,833 keywords). This Doug Ford is better (less manipulative) than 76.60% of the peer group. Doug Ford
Keyword details
Total words: 11,977
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.4% percentile 2.0% BS Score6 analyzed articles12K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst