Keyword summary
97% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,169 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Stearns results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , False Dilemma , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 806 hits . Analysis detected 8,110 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,329 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 75% (9,516 of 37,536 keywords). This David Stearns is worse (more manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group. David Stearns
Keyword details
Total words: 4,329
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.7% percentile 4.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 18.6% 18.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 7.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 2.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst