Keyword summary
37% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,375 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Schweikert results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 710 hits . Analysis detected 3,701 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,525 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 19% (30,628 of 37,536 keywords). This David Schweikert is better (less manipulative) than 81.60% of the peer group. David Schweikert
Keyword details
Total words: 6,525
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.4% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst