Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,003 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Cameron results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 1,589 hits . Analysis detected 12,609 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,717 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 50% (18,801 of 37,530 keywords). This David Cameron is better (less manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group. David Cameron
Keyword details
Total words: 10,717
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.9% percentile 2.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.7% 12.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.8% 14.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst