Keyword summary
73% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,955 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Brouillette results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Anecdotal , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 1,170 hits . Analysis detected 9,044 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,615 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (25,998 of 37,536 keywords). This David Brouillette is better (less manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group. David Brouillette
Keyword details
Total words: 10,615
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.7% percentile 2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst