Keyword summary
32% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,757 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Driscoll results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 594 hits . Analysis detected 3,655 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,028 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (29,586 of 34,832 keywords). This Dan Driscoll is better (less manipulative) than 84.90% of the peer group. Dan Driscoll
Keyword details
Total words: 7,028
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst