Keyword summary
21%3 analyzed articles/videos5,074 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cyberattacks And Hacks results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 2,525 hits. Analysis detected 12,165 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,046 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (30,948 of 34,755 keywords). This Cyberattacks And Hacks is better (less manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group.
Cyberattacks And Hacks
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
11%Cyberattacks And Hacks (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

11% percentile
025507510011.0% percentile
1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles18K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.0%14.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos