Keyword summary
60% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,545 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Culver City results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 1,050 hits . Analysis detected 10,717 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,992 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (25,365 of 37,536 keywords). This Culver City is better (less manipulative) than 67.60% of the peer group. Culver City
Keyword details
Total words: 12,992
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles13K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst