Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,748 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cuba Government results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 1,795 hits . Analysis detected 9,232 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,508 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (31,496 of 37,536 keywords). This Cuba Government is better (less manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group. Cuba Government
Keyword details
Total words: 12,508
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.1% percentile 1.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles12.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst