Keyword summary
⁠5%2 analyzed articles/videos726 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Csam results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 283 hits. Analysis detected 2,018 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,459 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (15,912 of 36,701 keywords). This Csam is worse (more manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group.
Csam
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠57%Csam (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,459
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

57% percentile
025507510056.6% percentile
3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.5%11.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.9%4.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.4%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Special Pleading: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos