Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,184 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Craig Gillespie results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 2,077 hits . Analysis detected 13,156 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,736 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 37% (23,954 of 37,536 keywords). This Craig Gillespie is better (less manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group. Craig Gillespie
Keyword details
Total words: 12,736
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.2% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 16.3% 16.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst