Keyword summary
44%2 analyzed articles/videos761 analyzed words
BS Summary: These County Contracts results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Recency Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 551 hits. Analysis detected 1,988 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,387 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (29,678 of 36,116 keywords). This County Contracts is better (less manipulative) than 82.20% of the peer group.
County Contracts
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
18%County Contracts (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,387
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

18% percentile
025507510017.8% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.6%12.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate