Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 394 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Correspondents Dinner results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 30.1% saturation with 474 hits . Analysis detected 1,519 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,576 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 75% (8,893 of 34,832 keywords). This Correspondents Dinner is worse (more manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group. Correspondents Dinner
Keyword details
Total words: 1,576
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.5% percentile 4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 30.1% 30.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Halo Effect: Keyword 30.1%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.0% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% Red Herring: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst