Keyword summary
60%5 analyzed articles/videos1,523 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corporate Management results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 1,601 hits. Analysis detected 10,041 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,740 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (24,393 of 36,017 keywords). This Corporate Management is better (less manipulative) than 67.70% of the peer group.
Corporate Management
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
33%Corporate Management (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 10,740
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

32% percentile
025507510032.3% percentile
2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles10.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.5%13.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.9%14.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate