Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Corporate Incentives results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 394 hits. Analysis detected 1,311 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,229 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,533 keywords). This Corporate Incentives is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Corporate Incentives
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Corporate Incentives (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,229
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Horn Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos